We went through our list of papers on NGS genome assembly and SNP/Variant calling to find out few highly productive labs. The list of labs is not complete and will be updated as we go through more papers. The numbers on the map are arbitrary and do not represent any ranking system.
3. EBI, UK
10. [not in map yet] GenScale, IRISA, France
You will notice that traditional universities with strong computer science or biology departments, such as MIT, Stanford, Yale, Caltech, University of Wisconsin, etc. are surprisingly absent from the map. Why are they not interested in this challenging and fast-moving field that combines high- performance computing and large-scale biology?
We believe the big US universities are so busy chasing their own tails that they stopped solving real problems. They are well-funded and the did not face practical problems perceived by NGS researchers.
Let us go one step back and think about the real problem faced by NGS. It is scaling. Big universities usually solve scaling problems by buying large computers or moving to supercomputers. The scaling issue is so severe for genome centers that they could not keep throwing money at it. They had to innovate their way out of it. So, all labs listed in 1-5 were closely associated with genome centers, or genome centers themselves.
Why is JGI not in the top list? Once again, it is very likely that money is their real problem. As we discussed, money and innovating to scale are mutually exclusive.
We are seeing an interesting development. In the earlier days, biologists used to complain endlessly about how slow the sequencing centers were in responding to them, and dream about the number of problems they could solve, if each of them had a mini-JGI in their labs. Now the mini-JGIs reached their labs, but their keys to algorithms are still mostly being held by the sequencing centers.
With that background, the achievements of 7-9, who developed scaling algorithms without being associated with sequencing centers, is rather remarkable. Once again, we suspect money is the driving force for their innovations, but it is the lack of money and not rain fall of money.