Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) not only comes up with very creative and original ideas, he is also a master of using social media, drop-box and arxiv to get his scholarly writings reach his audience unhindered by myriads of government-funded economics professors. Here is what he wrote on his facebook page few days back -
HOW TO MAXIMIZE SUBSTANCE.
Academic production is now up to 99% housekeeping, chickenst, dealing with referees and perfecting commas, marketing, and only 1% substance. So trying the exact opposite with the following mode; wrote a paper, the shortest possible one on the idea. Put on FB here for 24 hours for crowdsourcing correction (Carl Fakhry found the math typos and inconsistencies in notation). Submitted the first draft to ArXiv, where it was posted a with day delay. Kept some typos in the first version (such as “reponse” instead of “response”) to signal I don’t give a fk, that this is not “job market science”.
If the idea has merit, it could eventually circulate perhaps be even plagiarized, and this may even take years and years. If it lacks in rigor it will certainly die, as there is no formalism to hide the BS.
All in all the non-substancel part of the process turned out to be < 1 hour.
Now to other, possibly, deeper things.
That helps us feel not too bad about numerous typos in our commentaries here.
The paper mentioned by him can be downloaded from the following link.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
The literature of heavy tails (typically) starts with a random walk and finds mechanisms that lead to fat tails under aggregation. We follow the inverse route and show how starting with fat tails we get to thin-tails when deriving the probability distribution of the response to a random variable. We introduce a general dose-response curve and argue that the left and right- boundedness or saturation of the response in natural things leads to thin- tails, even when the “underlying” random variable at the source of the exposure is fat-tailed.
He is writing another paper on ‘skin in the game’ and it is available from dropbox.
Nassim N. Taleb and Constantine Sandis
Standard economic theory makes an allowance for the agency problem, but not the compounding of moral hazard in the presence of informational opacity, particularly in what concerns tail events. But the ancients did; so did many aspects of moral philosophy. We propose a global and morally mandatory heuristic that anyone involved in an action which can possibly generate harm for others, even probabilistically, should be required to be exposed to some damage, regardless of context. While perhaps not su?cient, the heuristic is certainly necessary hence mandatory. It is supposed to counter risk hiding in the tails. We link the rule to various philosophical approaches to ethics and moral luck.